Carson City School Bond 2006

This year there is another school bond for the Carson City schools on the November ballot. The $25 million from this bond will go to new construction at the Middle School, plus replacing aging roofs and heating systems district-wide. I’ve got to disclose that I’m not a disinterested party in this bond issue; the company I work for is an engineering contractor for the school district, so if this bond is passed my company gets more work. And I’ve got a niece in Carson City schools. But even if that wasn’t the case, I think it’s a good idea to get this passed. There are parts of our schools that are getting old and need to be replaced. Ignoring the problem will just send maintenance costs higher and disrupt the learning experience for our kids.

Here’s what this bond will cover:

  • A new building at the Middle School. There are thirteen portable classrooms at the Carson Middle School right now. These have got to be replaced with a new permanent building. Kids shouldn’t be learning in glorified mobile homes.
  • New roofs. You can only patch a leaky roof so many times. And water isn’t the only thing that can leak through. The older roofs on Carson City’s schools aren’t energy efficient, so heat is leaking in during the summer and out during the winter, making the heating and cooling systems have to work that much harder, raising the district’s energy bills.
  • New mechanical systems. Speaking of the heating and cooling systems, they’re all getting old too. Most of the schools need to have theirs replaced with newer, more efficient models.
  • Drainage work at Carson High. Improve runoff to get rid of standing water and huge mud puddles. Important not just for maintenance reasons, but also because the West Nile virus has made its way to the Carson area.

I know firsthand what a difference it can make to upgrade all these little things. I just had a new roof and a new heating/cooling system (along with low-e windows) installed at my house, and this summer has been so much more bearable because of it. So if I can get it at my house, why shouldn’t schoolkids have the same benefits?

Another fact is that this is a “tax continuation” bond. That means that because other bonds will be expiring at the same time, property taxes won’t go up. But, on the other hand, if it isn’t passed, taxes won’t go down either (do they ever?). The money that would have gone to the school will just go into the city’s general fund. I say let’s give it to the kids instead. Of course, I live in Douglas County, so it’s not my money anyway. But hopefully a majority of Carson voters will agree.

In fact, I’d say this bond isn’t big enough. Carson City is fast approaching 60,000 people, but the town still only has one high school. It seems like if we want to be looking forward at giving our kids the best education, we should start thinking about adding a second high school, and maybe even a third middle school, to the district. In fact, a third middle school used to be part of the master plan, but it was dropped in favor of expanding the Carson Middle School we have now.

Reno has a population of 200,000, only 3.5 times Carson, but they have seven or eight high schools. We need to start catching up before Carson High gets too overcrowded.


  1. Yes, Carson needs a new high school! It was packed when I went there (ref: dinosaurs roaming earth). The last of my three daughters just graduated in June and it was still a mess.

    The problem is there are more homes in Carson without children than with children, so (old folk) property owners don’t see the benefits of having modern educational facilities.

    The rich irony is these are the same people writing Letters to the Editor bemoaning the state of education and teenagers, in particular. By not voting for the bond, the letter writers are part of the problem, not part of the answer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *